The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

cond1(true, x, y) → cond2(gr(x, y), x, y)
cond2(true, x, y) → cond3(gr(x, 0), x, y)
cond2(false, x, y) → cond4(gr(y, 0), x, y)
cond3(true, x, y) → cond3(gr(x, 0), p(x), y)
cond3(false, x, y) → cond1(and(gr(x, 0), gr(y, 0)), x, y)
cond4(true, x, y) → cond4(gr(y, 0), x, p(y))
cond4(false, x, y) → cond1(and(gr(x, 0), gr(y, 0)), x, y)
gr(0, x) → false
gr(s(x), 0) → true
gr(s(x), s(y)) → gr(x, y)
and(true, true) → true
and(false, x) → false
and(x, false) → false
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
cond3(true, s(x114865_5), y) →⁺ cond3(true, x114865_5, y)
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [].
The pumping substitution is [x114865_5 / s(x114865_5)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)